0.04/0.13 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_17872 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1440 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 180 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 12:51:22 EDT 2023 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.48 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LzueQtxFPM/Vampire---4.8_17872 0.18/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.45/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHSA. 0.45/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.45/0.55 # Starting pre_casc_6 with 720s (4) cores 0.45/0.55 # Starting sh4 with 360s (2) cores 0.45/0.55 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.55 # Starting full_lambda_7 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.55 # pre_casc_6 with pid 18052 completed with status 0 0.45/0.55 # Result found by pre_casc_6 0.45/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHSA. 0.45/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.45/0.55 # Starting pre_casc_6 with 720s (4) cores 0.45/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true) 0.45/0.55 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLS33-MHSFFSBN 0.45/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total) 0.45/0.55 # Starting new_ho_10 with 389s (1) cores 0.45/0.55 # Starting pre_casc_6 with 73s (1) cores 0.45/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 65s (1) cores 0.45/0.55 # Starting new_bool_2 with 65s (1) cores 0.45/0.55 # pre_casc_6 with pid 18059 completed with status 0 0.45/0.55 # Result found by pre_casc_6 0.45/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHSA. 0.45/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.45/0.55 # Starting pre_casc_6 with 720s (4) cores 0.45/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true) 0.45/0.55 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLS33-MHSFFSBN 0.45/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total) 0.45/0.55 # Starting new_ho_10 with 389s (1) cores 0.45/0.55 # Starting pre_casc_6 with 73s (1) cores 0.45/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s 0.45/0.55 0.45/0.55 # Proof found! 0.45/0.55 # SZS status Theorem 0.45/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.45/0.55 thf(decl_22, type, binary717961607le_T_a: binary1439146945Tree_a > a > binary1439146945Tree_a > binary1439146945Tree_a). 0.45/0.55 thf(decl_29, type, binary1721989714Tree_a: (a > int) > binary1439146945Tree_a > $o). 0.45/0.55 thf(decl_49, type, h: a > int). 0.45/0.55 thf(decl_50, type, t1: binary1439146945Tree_a). 0.45/0.55 thf(decl_51, type, t2: binary1439146945Tree_a). 0.45/0.55 thf(decl_52, type, x: a). 0.45/0.55 thf(fact_3_sortLemmaL, axiom, ![X39:a > int, X103:binary1439146945Tree_a, X104:a, X105:binary1439146945Tree_a]:(((binary1721989714Tree_a @ X39 @ X103)<=(binary1721989714Tree_a @ X39 @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ X103 @ X104 @ X105)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LzueQtxFPM/Vampire---4.8_17872', fact_3_sortLemmaL)). 0.45/0.55 thf(conj_0, conjecture, (binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ t1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LzueQtxFPM/Vampire---4.8_17872', conj_0)). 0.45/0.55 thf(fact_1_s, axiom, (binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LzueQtxFPM/Vampire---4.8_17872', fact_1_s)). 0.45/0.55 thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X39:a > int, X103:binary1439146945Tree_a, X104:a, X105:binary1439146945Tree_a]:(((binary1721989714Tree_a @ X39 @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ X103 @ X104 @ X105))=>(binary1721989714Tree_a @ X39 @ X103))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_3_sortLemmaL])). 0.45/0.55 thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X1779:a > int, X1780:binary1439146945Tree_a, X1781:a, X1782:binary1439146945Tree_a]:((~(binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1779 @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ X1780 @ X1781 @ X1782))|(binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1779 @ X1780))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])). 0.45/0.55 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ t1), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.45/0.55 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X18:a, X28:binary1439146945Tree_a, X39:a > int, X30:binary1439146945Tree_a]:(((binary1721989714Tree_a @ X39 @ X28)|~((binary1721989714Tree_a @ X39 @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ X28 @ X18 @ X30))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.45/0.55 thf(c_0_7, plain, (binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_s])). 0.45/0.55 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~((binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ t1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.45/0.55 thf(c_0_9, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7]), c_0_8]), ['proof']). 0.45/0.55 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.45/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 390 0.45/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 48 0.45/0.55 # Initial clauses : 574 0.45/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 16 0.45/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 558 0.45/0.55 # Processed clauses : 220 0.45/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 4 0.45/0.55 # ...subsumed : 85 0.45/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 131 0.45/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 71 0.45/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.45/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.45/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.45/0.55 # Generated clauses : 133 0.45/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 90 0.45/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.45/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 0.45/0.55 # Paramodulations : 56 0.45/0.55 # Factorizations : 2 0.45/0.55 # NegExts : 0 0.45/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 71 0.45/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 43 0.45/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.45/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0 0.45/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.45/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.45/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.45/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.45/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.45/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.45/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.45/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.45/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.45/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.45/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 61 0.45/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14 0.45/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.45/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 11 0.45/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 36 0.45/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 428 0.45/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 1302 0.45/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.45/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 0 0.45/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 424 0.45/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 390 0.45/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 77 0.45/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44 0.45/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.45/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2 0.45/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.45/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 220 0.45/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0 0.45/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 46053 0.45/0.55 0.45/0.55 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.45/0.55 # User time : 0.048 s 0.45/0.55 # System time : 0.007 s 0.45/0.55 # Total time : 0.055 s 0.45/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 5736 pages 0.59/0.55 0.59/0.55 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.59/0.55 # User time : 0.095 s 0.59/0.55 # System time : 0.019 s 0.59/0.55 # Total time : 0.114 s 0.59/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 2688 pages 0.59/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting 0.59/0.56 EOF